twtxt

Timeline for https://eapl.me/twtxt.txt

🔄 Refresh timeline

👨‍💻 Login

Following: 16

tkanos https://twtxt.net/user/tkanos/twtxt.txt Remove

eaplme https://eapl.me/twtxt.txt Remove

eaplmx https://eapl.mx/twtxt.txt Remove

lyse https://lyse.isobeef.org/twtxt.txt Remove

prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt Remove

rrraksamam https://twtxt.net/user/rrraksamam/twtxt.txt Remove

darch https://neotxt.dk/user/darch/twtxt.txt Remove

shreyan https://twtxt.net/user/shreyan/twtxt.txt Remove

movq https://www.uninformativ.de/twtxt.txt Remove

bender https://twtxt.net/user/bender/twtxt.txt Remove

stigatle https://yarn.stigatle.no/user/stigatle/twtxt.txt Remove

darch http://darch.dk/twtxt.txt Remove

xuu https://txt.sour.is/user/xuu/twtxt.txt Remove

jason https://jasonsanta.xyz/twtxt.txt Remove

mckinley https://twtxt.net/user/mckinley/twtxt.txt Remove

eapl-mes-7-daily-links https://feeds.twtxt.net/eapl-mes-7-daily-links/twtxt.txt Remove


movq
I keep coming across the claim that Windows NT and 2000 can run OS/2 programs (due to the shared history between IBM and Microsoft). And indeed, it works – to some degree:



This compatibility layer only applies to 16 bit OS/2 1.x programs:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_of_Windows_NT#OS/2_environment_subsystem

32 bit OS/2 2.x programs don’t run:



I wonder how many text mode 16 bit OS/2 programs still existed when Windows 2000 came out. 🤔 Was it really worth keeping this subsystem around for so long?
2 weeks ago
💬 Reply


⏭️ Next